Chances
are, you're celebrating today's lower gas prices. AAA reports that the
national average price of gas is $2.60 today, the lowest since December
2009. The result: an estimated $70 billion in direct savings for U.S.
consumers over the next 12 months. At previous prices, the average
American was spending about $2,600 a year on gasoline, so the 20% price
decline would result in $520 more to save or spend.
It gets better. Even though gas prices (and, therefore, the cost of driving) have plummeted, the Internal Revenue Service is raising the standard mileage rates that people can deduct on their tax return for business travel, from 56 cents in 2014 to 57.5 cents per business mile driven next year.
Only the investment markets seem to think that cycling an extra $70 billion into the U.S. economy is a bad thing. This past week, large cap stocks, represented by the S&P 500 index, saw their prices fall by 3.5%-their biggest drop since May 2012. Why? The only possible explanation is that rapid Wall Street traders believe that lower oil prices will harm the economies of America's trading partners, and therefore impact the U.S. economy indirectly.
So let's take a closer look. While U.S. consumers are cheering the decline in oil prices, and non-energy producing nations like Japan and countries in the Eurozone are seeing a boost in their economies, who's NOT celebrating?
As it turns out, some of the biggest losers are American domestic shale oil producers, who basically break even when oil prices are at their current $50-$60 a barrel levels. Any further drop in prices would slow down domestic energy production, and probably create a floor that would keep prices from falling much further.
Another big loser is the socialist government in Venezuela (remember Hugo Chavez?), which needs oil prices above $162 a barrel to pay for all of its social programs. You can also sympathize with Iran, which reportedly needs oil prices to move up to $135 barrel to stay in the black, due to continuing sanctions from the world community over its nuclear program, and the high cost of supporting Hezbollah and its own military ventures in the Middle East.
The biggest loser is probably Russia, which requires oil prices of at least $100 a barrel for its budget to withstand international sanctions and finance its own military adventures against neighboring nations. Economists are projecting that Russia will fall into a steep recession next year, when GDP could decline as much as 6%. The nation is experiencing what economists call "capital outflows" of $125 billion a year-a fancy way of saying that wealthy Russians are taking money out of Russian banks and either investing abroad or putting their rubles in banks located in more stable foreign jurisdictions. And in the process, they are exchanging their rubles for local currency, as a way to protect against the recent free-fall in Russia's currency. Bloomberg News recently published a graphic which many Americans will find entertaining, but which is probably not happy news for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
It's interesting that the markets seem to be worrying about low oil prices when the economies with the most to lose are not just not major trading partners, but actual political enemies of U.S. interests. Cheaper oil will eventually be regarded as a plus for our economic-and political-interests, but the downturn suggests that Wall Street traders are hair-trigger ready to be spooked by anything they regard as unusual.
It gets better. Even though gas prices (and, therefore, the cost of driving) have plummeted, the Internal Revenue Service is raising the standard mileage rates that people can deduct on their tax return for business travel, from 56 cents in 2014 to 57.5 cents per business mile driven next year.
Only the investment markets seem to think that cycling an extra $70 billion into the U.S. economy is a bad thing. This past week, large cap stocks, represented by the S&P 500 index, saw their prices fall by 3.5%-their biggest drop since May 2012. Why? The only possible explanation is that rapid Wall Street traders believe that lower oil prices will harm the economies of America's trading partners, and therefore impact the U.S. economy indirectly.
So let's take a closer look. While U.S. consumers are cheering the decline in oil prices, and non-energy producing nations like Japan and countries in the Eurozone are seeing a boost in their economies, who's NOT celebrating?
As it turns out, some of the biggest losers are American domestic shale oil producers, who basically break even when oil prices are at their current $50-$60 a barrel levels. Any further drop in prices would slow down domestic energy production, and probably create a floor that would keep prices from falling much further.
Another big loser is the socialist government in Venezuela (remember Hugo Chavez?), which needs oil prices above $162 a barrel to pay for all of its social programs. You can also sympathize with Iran, which reportedly needs oil prices to move up to $135 barrel to stay in the black, due to continuing sanctions from the world community over its nuclear program, and the high cost of supporting Hezbollah and its own military ventures in the Middle East.
The biggest loser is probably Russia, which requires oil prices of at least $100 a barrel for its budget to withstand international sanctions and finance its own military adventures against neighboring nations. Economists are projecting that Russia will fall into a steep recession next year, when GDP could decline as much as 6%. The nation is experiencing what economists call "capital outflows" of $125 billion a year-a fancy way of saying that wealthy Russians are taking money out of Russian banks and either investing abroad or putting their rubles in banks located in more stable foreign jurisdictions. And in the process, they are exchanging their rubles for local currency, as a way to protect against the recent free-fall in Russia's currency. Bloomberg News recently published a graphic which many Americans will find entertaining, but which is probably not happy news for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
It's interesting that the markets seem to be worrying about low oil prices when the economies with the most to lose are not just not major trading partners, but actual political enemies of U.S. interests. Cheaper oil will eventually be regarded as a plus for our economic-and political-interests, but the downturn suggests that Wall Street traders are hair-trigger ready to be spooked by anything they regard as unusual.
|
Sources:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/5-countries-that-will-be-the-biggest-losers-from-oils-slide-2014-11-20?page=2
http://blogs.piie.com/realtime/?p=4644 http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/irs-watch/irs-raises-standard-mileage-rate-for-businesses-72990-1.html?ET=webcpa:e3476082:a:&st=email&utm_content=buffer4179f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer http://www.forbes.com/sites/northwesternmutual/2014/11/27/lower-oil-prices-give-a-gift-to-consumers/ |
|
Sincerely,
Bill Morrissey, CFP® and Tammy Prouty, CFP®
Sound Financial Planning, Inc.
|
|
PLEASE READ THIS WARNING:
All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or otherwise
recorded by the Sound Financial Planning, Inc. corporate e-mail system
and is subject to archival, monitoring and/or review, by and/or
disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. This message is
intended only for the use of the person(s) ("intended recipient") to
whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender as soon as possible and delete the message without reading it
or making a copy. Any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other
use of this message or any of its content by any person other than the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Sound Financial Planning,
Inc. has taken precautions to screen this message for viruses, but we
cannot guarantee that it is virus free nor are we responsible for any
damage that may be caused by this message. Sound Financial Planning,
Inc. only transacts business in states where it is properly registered
or notice filed, or excluded or exempted from registration requirements.
Follow-up and individualized responses that involve either the
effecting or attempting to effect transactions in securities or the
rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, as the
case may be, will not be made absent compliance with state investment
adviser and investment adviser representative registration requirements,
or an applicable exemption or exclusion. This information should not
be construed as investment advice. All information is believed to be
from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its
completeness or accuracy. WE WOULD LIKE TO CREDIT THIS ARTICLE'S CONTENT
TO BOB VERES.
